RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-03599
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: NO
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
1. His Date of Rank (DOR) to the grade of major be adjusted to
10 Oct 12 rather than 12 Jan 13 and his effective date of
promotion be changed to 25 Mar 13 rather than 17 Jul 13.
2. He receive all back pay and allowances.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:
Due to an administrative oversight, the Arizona Air National
Guard (AZ ANG) state headquarters failed to process his
promotion in a timely manner, causing his name not to be placed
on the list as a candidate for the Nov 12 ANG Position Vacancy
(PV) promotion board which had an effective date of 25 Mar 13.
Consequently, he lost time in grade and military pay. The
administrative error at the state headquarters level was beyond
his control.
In support of his appeal, the applicant provides copies of
letters from his Military Personnel Flight (MPF) commander and
superintendent; electronic mail correspondence; his PV promotion
package and various other documents associated with his
requests.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit A.
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
On 5 Sep 06, the applicant was appointed as a first lieutenant
in the AZ ANG. On 1 Oct 08, the applicant was promoted to the
grade of captain in the AZ ANG.
________________________________________________________________
THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
NGB/A1PO concurs with the applicants request and recommends
that his DOR be changed from 12 Jan 13 to 10 Oct 12 and his
Promotion Effective Date (PED) be changed from 17 Jul 13 to
25 Mar 13.
On 10 Oct 12, the applicant was originally considered for
promotion to the grade of major; however, due to an
administrative error, his selection for promotion was not
processed through NGB in a timely manner. He was subsequently
processed for promotion on a later list and was promoted
effective 17 Jul 13.
If A1PO had received the original promotion request, the
applicant would have been promoted with a DOR of 10 Oct 12 and a
PED of 25 Mar 13 (the date that the Nov 12 ANG PV list was
approved).
The complete A1PO evaluation is at Exhibit C.
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF THE AIR FORCE EVALUATION:
A copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the
applicant on 6 Sep 13 for review and comment within 30 days. As
of this date, no response has been received by this office
(Exhibit D).
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
1. The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by
existing law or regulations.
2. The application was timely filed.
3. Sufficient relevant evidence has been presented to
demonstrate the existence of error or injustice warranting
corrective action. Having carefully reviewed this application,
we agree with the recommendation of the Air Force OPR and adopt
the rationale expressed as the basis for our decision that the
applicant has been the victim of either an error or an
injustice. Therefore, we recommend the applicants record be
corrected to the extent indicated below.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT:
The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air
Force relating to APPLICANT, be corrected to show a Date of Rank
(DOR) in the grade of major (0-4) of 10 Oct 12 rather than
12 Jan 13 and a PED of 25 Mar 13 rather than 17 Jul 13.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2013-03599 in Executive Session on 26 Jun 14, under
the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
, Panel Chair
, Member
, Member
All members voted to correct the records, as recommended. The
following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 149, dated 29 Jul 13, w/atchs.
Exhibit B. Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
Exhibit C. Letter, NGB/A1PO, dated 20 Aug 13.
Exhibit D. Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 6 Sep 13.
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03196
If the promotion recommendation had been received in a timely manner her name would have been submitted to the Aug 12, Position Vacancy List approved by Secretary of Defense on 5 Nov 12. The applicant was originally boarded for promotion on 14 Jul 12; however, her promotion was not submitted to NGB/A1PO in a timely manner due to an administrative error. If NGB/A1PO had received the original promotion request, they would have promoted the applicant with a DOR of 14 Jul 12 and a Promotion...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05647
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05647 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: Her Promotion Effective Date (PED) and Date of Rank (DOR) be backdated to the April 2013 Promotion Board results. ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: Due to an administrative error during a period...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC-2012-04604
The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary (OPR) and is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: NGB/A1PO recommends granting the applicants request to change his Date of Appointment (DOA) in the Air National Guard from 7 May 10 to 30 Sep 09; however, if the BCMR approves, his Total Years Service Date (TYSD); Total Federal Commissioned...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05039
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05039 COUNSEL: NONE XXXXXXXXX HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His Date of Rank (DOR) to the grade of major (O-4) be changed to 19 November 2012 and his Promotion Effective Date (PED) to 30 March 2013. THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that he was promoted to the...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01263
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01263 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His records be corrected to reflect that he was promoted to the grade of major (O-4), effective 27 Feb 13, instead of 9 Oct 13, with a date of rank (DOR) of 5 May 13 (sic), instead of 30 Oct 13. On 30 Oct 13, according to information provided by the applicant, the applicant met a second Federal Recognition...
AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-03281
As the OPR’s were not completed in accordance with governing Instructions and were not timely, she was forced to meet a mandatory promotion board instead of qualifying for a Position Vacancy (PV) promotion to major. _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Applicant states the ANG advisory cites a paragraph from ANG Instruction (ANGI) 36-2504, Federal Recognition Of Promotion In The Air National Guard And As A Reserve Of...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2006-02873
Had he been selected for promotion by this Board, he would have a DOR of 7 April 2006. When the error was realized, the ANG promoted him via Position Vacancy (PV) and recommended he apply to this Board to have his DOR and PED corrected to the earlier date. ______________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to APPLICANT be corrected to show that he was promoted to the Reserve...
AF | BCMR | CY2012 | BC 2012 05761
While he was not a member of the NVANG for a year prior to the suspense for being submitted for promotion, he had been on the Reserve Active Status List (RASL) continuously since he was commissioned in 2008 and therefore should have been recommended for promotion during the Calendar Year 2011B (CY11B) Second Half Captain Promotion Selection Board. However, after a thorough review of the evidence of record and the applicants complete submission, to include his rebuttal response, we are not...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2012 05761
While he was not a member of the NVANG for a year prior to the suspense for being submitted for promotion, he had been on the Reserve Active Status List (RASL) continuously since he was commissioned in 2008 and therefore should have been recommended for promotion during the Calendar Year 2011B (CY11B) Second Half Captain Promotion Selection Board. However, after a thorough review of the evidence of record and the applicants complete submission, to include his rebuttal response, we are not...
AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2009-03125
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS A complete copy of the NGB/A1POE evaluation is at Exhibit C. The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the application was denied without a personal appearance; and the application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this application.